FpML Issues Tracker
closed
Tweak
N/A
Coding Scheme
awinkel
None
Summary
The short sale coding scheme value NTAV does not correspond to the standard used for reporting defined by ESMA's transaction reporting validation rules.
See rule 192, field short selling indicator: https://www.esma.europa.eu/document/transaction-reporting-validation-rules-2021-update
Notes:
mgratacos
01/25/22 4:32 am
One of the current FpML scheme’s values have a code different to that specified by ESMA. Thus, “Information not available” is “NTAV” in the FpML scheme but it should be”UNDI” according to ESMA documentation.
There are different versions of the short sale FpML scheme (most recent one 16/12/2021):
https://www.fpml.org/coding-scheme/esma-mifir-short-sale-1-0.xml
https://www.fpml.org/coding-scheme/esma-mifir-short-sale-2-0.xml
https://www.fpml.org/coding-scheme/esma-mifir-short-sale
However, they all have the same values:
NTAV = “Information not available”
SELL = “No short sale”
SESH = “Short sale with no exemption”
SSEX = “Short sale with exemption”
Nevertheless, in the following ESMA documentation:
https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma65-8-2594_annex_1_mifir_transaction_reporting_validation_rules.xlsx
Specified values for rule 192 field 62 (“Short selling indicator”) are:
‘SESH’= “Short sale with no exemption”
‘SSEX’= “”Short sale with exemption”
‘SELL’= “No short sale”
‘UNDI’= “Information not available”
Additionally, the document contains the following validation rule regarding this field: “If populated, only one of the following values can be populated: ‘SESH’, ‘SSEX’, ‘SELL’, ‘UNDI’.”
In short, the way of expressing “Information not available” differs between FpML schemes (“NTAV”) and ESMA documentation (“UNDI”).
mgratacos
02/20/22 5:35 am
Minutes AWG 2022-02-10
mgratacos
03/28/22 6:21 am