FpML Issues Tracker
closed
Minor
Always
Equity Derivatives
Admin
apparry
Summary
The EQD rules that have a context of "Trade (complex type)", also need a context of "Contract (complex type)".
The context today: "# Trade (complex type): eqd-1 eqd-2 eqd-4 eqd-5 eqd-12 eqd-13 eqd-14"
The context should be: "# Trade (complex type), Contract (complex type): eqd-1 eqd-2 eqd-4 eqd-5 eqd-12 eqd-13 eqd-14"
Notes:
mgratacos
05/09/08 1:43 pm
EQDWG 2008-05-09: agreement to adopt as proposed.
lyteck
07/16/08 7:35 pm
implemented in trunk, as proposed
lyteck
07/17/08 8:36 pm
existing eqd-1, eqd-2, eqd-4, eqd-12, eqd-13, eqd-14 are reverted back to context=”trade”
rule definitions are different because of trade vs. contract header differences, therefore created new eqd-2b, eqd-4b, eqd-12b, eqd-13b, eqd-14b (for context=”contract”)(also, test cases need to be created)
(see related http://www.fpml.org/issues/view.php?id=672)
matthewdr
08/12/08 5:23 pm
Accepting the resolution.