FpML Issues Tracker

1081: review rule shared-29: need to use also account element

January 24, 2012

closed

Minor

N/A

Validation Rules

danieldui

danieldui

Summary

Rule shared-29 (not published yet) compares buyerPartyReference/@href and sellerPartyReference/@href

The rule can be seen in the attached image.

We need to check if this rule should also compare the account fields and check what context the rule should have.

Notes:

  • h_mcallister

    01/26/12 12:48 am

    buyerPartyReference/@href must not be equal to sellerPartyReference/@href, except in the case where buyerAccountReference and sellerAccountReference are both present and buyerAccountReference/@href is not equal to sellerAccountReference/@href (i.e an internal trade).

  • danieldui

    03/27/12 2:11 pm

    The group discussed the issue. We need to do more analysis to make progress.

    ACTION: Daniel to prepare material for further discussion.

  • danieldui

    06/12/12 2:49 pm

    I added the another document. At the end I think we do end up with two rules in to cover all the cases.

  • danieldui

    06/12/12 3:04 pm

    Irina thinks that there might be more complex cases with FX products where these rules are not sufficient.

    ACTION: Irina to prepare example

    Need more investigation before closing this issue.

  • danieldui

    08/07/12 1:54 pm

    Update: WIP – Daniel to propose reformulation of rules.

  • mkoli

    08/07/12 3:43 pm

    change has been made to rules-english-shared.xml – for rule shared-19

  • danieldui

    09/03/12 2:18 pm

    The FX rules are affected, but they look OK as they are. No need to make changes.

  • danieldui

    09/11/12 1:47 pm

    The FX rules OK as they are.

  • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.