Forums

FpML Discussion

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: developing a new product #1721
    iqbalhyd
    Spectator

    Hi Marc, I have sent you my XSD, sample XML, diagram, and product description to your email. Please have a look and let me know the next step. Regards. Muhammad Iqbal

    in reply to: Need help in understanding FPML propeties. #1717
    iqbalhyd
    Spectator

    Hi Marc, Thanks again for your help. I have created another post with subject “developing a new product” which includes product image, please have a look of that and let me know you thoughts. Regards, John

    in reply to: Need help in understanding FPML propeties. #1713
    iqbalhyd
    Spectator

    Hi Marc, Great help thanks. I have build a working draft of new product “dualCurrencyDeposit” and attached is an bird eye view of that. Is there any process to submit my new product and some one verify it? or/and could you if you take a look and give me your thoughts please? Regards, John. [img]http://116.12.50.16:8080/dcd3/public_pages/images/dualCurrencyDeposit.gif[/img]

    in reply to: Need help in understanding FPML propeties. #1708
    iqbalhyd
    Spectator

    Hi Marc, Thanks a lot for your help. My application is dealing dual currency deposit, where a party say party1 deposits some principal amount in a base currency say USD for a certain tenor and agreed on a strike rate against term currency say EUR, now there are two possibilities: 1. if at the maturity the spot falls down than the strike, the party1 will receives principal plus interest base currency. 2. if spot does not falls, then party1 will receives an enhance deal i.e. amount in term currency at strike rate + interest. I have identified that FPML does not supports such product but need some enhancement to reflect a new product. I would really appreciate if some one help me out to extend FPML or refer me some document/tutorial in this regard? I know there are a lot of XML components developed and laying under shared component area, I want to make sure that the new component I am going to design should not duplication with existing one. What is the best way to do so? Regards. John

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)