FpML Issues Tracker

13: Need for views

April 13, 2005

closed

Minor

Always

Request New Feature

Admin

mgratacos

Summary

Need for Views. Rearranging the FpML schema -> using a chameleon style design, we will have a shared layer without namespace and different views subschemas with its own namespace. Use the substitution group concept to select which "view" of product would be needed for a particular message (e.g. have different substitution groups for pre-trade, confirmation, and post-trade products).

Notes:

  • mgratacos

    04/13/05 3:06 pm

    Brian Lynn’s proposal on views to be considered by AWG prior to CC review. AWG thinks that it is an interesting idea but that some prototyping should be done. (the initial trigger of this proposal was the need for using adjustable dates into different contexts).

  • mgratacos

    06/04/07 8:07 am

    Approach is now leading to a master schema with annotations from which an xslt transformation is applied in order to generate the view specific schemas.

  • mgratacos

    02/19/08 11:49 am

    Views were implemented in the first working draft for version 5.0.

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    The FpML Issues Tracker is designed to facilitate public interaction in the standard.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue