FpML Issues Tracker

232: Increases: message exchange is not clear

October 18, 2006

closed

Major

Always

Schema

Admin

mgratacos

Summary

-IncreaseConfirmed- not sure when it should be sent. -No response for RequestIncreaseConfirmation. Shouldn't IncreaseConfirmed be a response message? -Failure/successes are missing. -At what point do we send the RequestIncreaseConfirmation? What's the condition that triggers it? If you are just confirming a later version of the trade, do we really need this message pattern?

Notes:

  • matthew

    04/04/07 10:44 am

    Andrew Jacobs has corrected this in the Messaging Branch. Please incrementally merge in Andrew’s work from this branch.

  • mgratacos

    04/26/10 11:29 am

    This has been fixed in version 5.0. See section 3.3.3. Generic (Multi-Event) Flows.

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    The FpML Issues Tracker is designed to facilitate public interaction in the standard.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue