FpML Issues Tracker
closed
Minor
Always
Validation Rules
Admin
None
Summary
Add a valid and invalid example for rule pr-1.
Today are there are no examples to test. This compounds and masks the separate issue that the rule refers to an element when it should refer to a type.
Notes:
mgratacos
10/23/07 2:21 pm
VWG 2007-10-23: agreement to add example.
matthew
03/10/08 7:20 pm
This issue is being reopened because it was resolved without a resolution.
Closing the issue was a breach of FpML practise because:
1. Issues must be resolved before being marked as resolved.
2. Resolution must record exactly what the agreed resolution was.
3. To prevent misunderstanding the raiser of the issue must be consulted for explanations of a potentially misunderstood issue, and should be invited as a guest to the WG meeting to discuss the issue.
The VWG agreed at its meeting 2007-10-23 to fix the outstanding issue by adding an example. The outstanding issue has not yet been fixed.
The rule remains open until resolved, either by completing the actions or by resolving using another solution.
mgratacos
04/29/08 1:55 pm
Rule pr-1 has been deprecated. It has been replaced by rule ref-18, which doesn’t include an example. The issue still applies.
matthewdr
04/29/08 2:31 pm
The rule pr-1 is now deprecated. The need for the example is gone.