FpML Issues Tracker

857: Correct fx-45 (revised)

October 1, 2008

closed

Minor

Always

Validation Rules

Admin

None

Summary

The example invalid-fx-36-02.xml is invalid against rule fx-45 as well as fx-36.

Correct invalid-fx-36-02.xml so it is only invalid gainst fx-36.

Notes:

  • andrew

    10/01/08 4:07 pm

    The context for fx-45 in incorrect, it should be FxDigitalOption. Currently fx-44 and fx-45 are the same and they should apply to different types.

  • matthewdr

    10/21/08 1:18 pm

    Agreed at the VWG to to corrext fx-45 as AJ proposed.

  • mgratacos

    10/21/08 1:18 pm

    fx-45 needs to be corrected as Andrew proposed.

  • lyteck

    10/28/08 5:44 pm

    fx-45: corrected context to FxDigitalOption, as agreed.

  • matthewdr

    11/18/08 3:51 pm

    Closed following testing.

    • Leave an update

    You must be logged in to post an update.

    Report an Issue

    The FpML Issues Tracker is designed to facilitate public interaction in the standard.

    By registering you will be able to submit corrections and comments, generate reports, and view the complete issues archive for FpML.

    Report Issue