FpML Issues Tracker
closed
Minor
Always
Validation Rules
Admin
None
Summary
eqd-23 may overlap with eqd-31 making one of them redundant.
We should assess redundancy and act.
closed
Minor
Always
Validation Rules
Admin
None
eqd-23 may overlap with eqd-31 making one of them redundant.
We should assess redundancy and act.
Notes:
matthewdr
03/24/09 5:18 pm
—–Original Message—–
From: Andrew P Parry
Sent: 24 March 2009 16:01
To: Christian Nentwich
Cc: Matthew D Rawlings
Subject: RE: More feedback on validation rules
Christian
I cannot reply to the group because I am not subscribed
– eqd-23 (“every option has effective date after trade date”) seems to
be made redundant by eqd-31 (“anything deriving from
EquityDerivativeBase has effective date after start date”)
eqd-23 is true for any and all products ( inc. swaps ) eqd-31 should be scrapped, in the same way “termination date should always be after effective date” regardless of product
I do not know the other rules from memory, but suspect the same argument will apply
Regards
matthewdr
04/07/09 1:17 pm
Discussed at the VWG today. Agreed to make eqd-23 redundant.
iyermakova
04/07/09 2:57 pm
– Removed eqd-23 from rules-english-eqd.xml. Rationale for removal: eqd-23 is redundant. The effect of eqd-23 is available by entailment of a more generic rule eqd-31. The change is committed to trunk (4.6 Third Working Draft)