FpML Issues Tracker
closed
Minor
Have not tried
Schema
ktdonovan
mgratacos
Summary
The changeEvent element in the fpml-contract-notification-4-6 schema is abstract and has a default value set. I don't think this default is inherited by any substitutes of changeEvent so isn't the default redundant? Perhaps more importantly is default="ChangeEvent" just a typo and should it read type="ChangeEvent" which would make a great deal more sense.
Notes:
mgratacos
10/08/09 3:09 pm
Yes, you are absolutely right. It’s a typo and it should read type=”ChangeEvent”. I don’t think this issue has any impact on instance documents since the ChangeEvent type is empty so I propose we correct it in 4.7 and leave 4.6 Recommendation as it is.
mgratacos
10/08/09 4:26 pm
This has been corrected in the trunk (4.7).
mgratacos
10/14/09 9:05 am
This has been corrected in the 5.0 branch.
mgratacos
10/14/09 9:14 am
The correction will be published in the second working draft of version 4.7 and the fourth working draft of version 5.0.